Vai al contenuto

Suzuki DRZ: thoughts on the DR-Z4S's competitors (part 3/3)

3/1 - Dual motorbikes

Dual motorbikes, or “enduros”, before this definition led to confusion with enduro racing bikes, were born with yet another name, namely “scramblers”. Scrambles were competitions that were all the rage in the UK in the 1950s and 1960s, and were nothing more than motocross races on a natural, non-permanent track, a grassy area with a track outlined by a rope attached to stakes, like the slats of enduro racing, but much wider and more spread out. They were obviously very simple races to organise in a land full of pastures and meadows, and in those years such races were run practically every Sunday and at every level, attracting a public that was sometimes counted in the tens of thousands, just to give you an idea.

The participants were renowned riders, followed and contested by the manufacturers, but also passionate people who for one day raced the same bike they used to go to work with during the week, often not even changing the tyres, at most taking the lights off. The bikes were simple: an engine, a frame, suspension, wheels, tank and seat, not much more. 

BSA was the first to have a great sales success with a scrambler motorbike, even outside the competitive field (there were already versions of the BSA Gold Star or the Matchless G80, to name but two, but they were considered competition bikes), it was the Victor Special, directly derived from the b44 and b50 two-time winners of the 500 class Motocross World Championship with Jeff Smith in 1964 and ’65: Thousands were sold on the thriving US market and the image of Michael Lang, the organiser, riding a BSA Victor Special around the Woodstock festival is famous.

The BSA, however, like practically all British brands, was unable to react to the renewal imposed by the Japanese factories and disappeared from the scene at the end of the 1960s. It was precisely the Japanese manufacturers that filled the market with an endless series of small scramblers with which the very young Americans happily roamed the deserts, prairies, ranches, but also the city. In 1975 Yamaha introduced the XT 500, what is in fact considered (albeit somewhat improperly, as we have seen) the first true road enduro bike. It was a bike that had many merits, which in the end could be summed up in one word: simplicity, great simplicity. Like the English scramblers: engine, frame, suspension, wheels, tank and saddle, nothing else was needed to go a bit everywhere, but without the limitations of racing bikes, which by then had become too extreme to be usable in everyday life.

The XT 500 evolved into the XT 550 and then the XT 600, which were better and better, but still light and usable and capable of everything. Then, in the anxiety of market competition with other manufacturers, electric starters, fairings were added and everything developed to single-cylinder bikes that weighed 200 kg and more. They were fine, no question, but they had completely lost the simplicity, agility and usability of their progenitors. And in fact, as chance would have it, far fewer of them were sold than before.

The problem is that motorbikes were (and often still are) made with criteria that do not take the motorcyclist into account in the slightest, perhaps also because the people who decide on them may have ridden them just to get their picture taken. They lose, or more likely have never even considered, the basic concept that a motorbike must be easy, agile, light and pleasant to ride. Then they fill them with totally useless and in the long run burdensome rubbish, or an infinite number of settings that the user is almost always incapable of using, not to mention the mappings...

Since you will rightly say who am I to talk like this, I will quote a phrase from one who understood motorbikes, Carlo Guzzi: “Everything that is not there does not cost, does not weigh, does not break”.

Of simple, light motorbikes capable of doing everything, but at the same time made with care and scrupulousness, there were fewer and fewer left. In fact, the now 40-year-old motorbikes of the 1980s are still highly sought-after and valuable, and so are the very few motorbikes that followed them, such as the Suzuki DR 350, Kawasaki KLX 300 R, Honda XR 400 or Suzuki DR-Z 400: try to see what the prices are for one of these used, but in excellent condition, if you can find it.

In today's neglected market, often unable to understand the true needs of buyers, Chinese and Indian companies have entered, filling cities with simple, agile and cheap motorbikes, forcing the Japanese giants to chase them with guilty delay.

For dual enduros, until this year there were only two bikes at the two extremes: the very easy, but too poorly equipped, Honda CRF 300 L, and the KTM 690 R (and derivatives in other colours with other brands), excellent, but demanding and far too powerful. There was nothing in between.

A company like Beta, in my opinion, missed a huge opportunity by not creating a simplified and more usable model of its 350 and 390 race enduro bikes.

After barely twenty years of reflection, Suzuki has decided to renew its highly successful DR-Z 400, wisely shifting it even more towards a dual vocation, but at a price that is not modest (albeit partially compensated for by the production quality) and perhaps on the edge of time: just look at the very recent Chinese offerings at EICMA in Milan.

3/2 - Comparisons between the DR-Z 4 S and other motorbikes

The peculiarity of the DR-Z 4 S is precisely that it is now more or less the only true dual on the market.

Of course there's the KTM 690 (or Husqvarna 701 or Gas Gas 700: just the colour changes), which happens to be the very bike I just sold to buy the DR-Z 4 S. Why?

Because the 690 is yes a bike that can do anything, but it is not an easy, life-simplifying bike. Mind you, it rides great and strong. Even too much. It's demanding, tiring if taken to real enduro riding, and basically seems to tell you at every metre ’is that all you can do? I could do much more than that! It's powerful (too much so), it has a chassis that allows you to go 130 mph (maybe even more, but I preferred to avoid that) on a dirt track feeling in control, but it always has to be ridden hard, without being able to relax. It doesn't take you home, so to speak, you have to constantly and constantly steer it. 

In addition, to comply with the Euro 4 (later 5) regulations, they had to “deflate” it a lot in the low and medium range: it almost feels like a four-cylinder engine, very sweet and very smooth that grows endlessly to a respectable power output. To give it a bit of ’back“ I was forced to change the exhaust and even partially remap it, but it still wasn't back to the levels of the previous versions of the 690, which vibrated much more and were less powerful, but had real low and midrange.

One bike that the DR-Z 4 S resembles is the first - mythical - Yamaha XT 600, the one from 1983. It was a bike produced with extraordinary care, at that time it was almost taken for granted, the Japanese manufacturers were spoiling us, making us get used to exceptional production quality. At that time Yamaha was pushing hard in the hope of ousting Honda as the world leader in motorbike production. It did not succeed, also because Honda reacted in its own way, but whoever bought those bikes could be sure that nothing had been left to chance, and that a Japanese engineer had spent long days studying every detail to make it work at its best. With that XT 600 you could do anything, ride placidly through hills and mountains, enjoy a couple of bends with a smile on your face, and then maybe have no problem going to see where that little road went. Even more so if it was unpaved and even if it turned into a path or a mule track. Sure, it was harder than with a racing enduro, but you could really do anything, even go on holiday in two with luggage, sleeping bag, tent and pan in tow.

It was certainly not a powerhouse, but the engine gave a magnificent feeling of power, of constant presence. Sure, above 120 km/h it was short of breath, but don't we want to put a big “who cares” on it?

Another bike it resembles, it could not be otherwise, is the Suzuki DR-Z 400 S, i.e. the mother, or big sister, call it what you will. The DR-Z 4 S has the same spirit, but over twenty years younger, and in those years technological progress has moved on: fuel injection gives a much better smoothness and fluidity, even though the 400 was already remarkable in this. The suspension is much improved, still soft, but while on the “old” one it was a little flaccid in its basic setting (a good technician could adapt it beautifully, but few really did), on the ’new“ one already as standard it is at an excellent level. Between delivery and suspension, riding the DR-Z 4 S feels like being on a cloud. 

On the ’old“ one, the engine was very sweet and very smooth, but to get some body in the low and medium range it was necessary to change the exhaust (especially the first part, i.e. the manifold, but not many people understood this either), while the 4 is wonderfully full in the low and medium range even with the delightfully subdued standard exhaust, Euro 5+ approved, and excuse me if I'm not saying much. 

The internal gear ratios are exactly the same between the 400 S and the new 4 S, and the final drive is also very similar: 15/44 for the 400, 15/43 for the new 4 S. Nevertheless, the 400 S was decidedly long in ratios, and for enduro use it was essential to shorten the ratios by fitting a 14 sprocket (the one on the E), while the 4 S has the right length of first gear, thanks precisely to the considerably greater torque in the low and medium range. On the new one it wouldn't be a bad thing if the fifth gear was made a little longer and stretched out, because it actually looks a little short.

One aspect in which the previous one was better is the seat: the “new” one is narrower and less comfortable, and over long distances this makes itself felt a little.

However, if I have to say one bike that immediately reminds you of the Suzuki DR-Z 4 S, I think I will surprise you, it is the Honda CRF 300 L. The new Suzuki has all the qualities of the Hondina, though. But it has as its strong points precisely those that make you wish for something better when riding the CRF 300 L: the engine is very sweet and very smooth, but just where on the Honda it leaves you disappointed, making you dream of a fuller and more powerful engine, the Suzuki achieves exactly what you would like. Then there are the suspensions, those on the standard CRF 300 L are cheap and shoddy, those on the DR-Z 4 S work, and well too. 

The Suzuki costs almost twice as much, but this is evident in the finish, the chassis and the quality of all the components.